WHO REALLY DECIDES? UNMASKING THE POLITICS OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN INDONESIA’S LEGAL SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55292/dcc8da71Keywords:
Public Participation, Legal System, Indonesia, Participatory Democracy, Political Elites, Lawmaking, GovernanceAbstract
This paper examines the paradox of public participation in Indonesia’s legal system, questioning the authoritative issue of “who really decides” in lawmaking processes. Although Indonesia’s Constitution and various legislative instruments formally recognize participation as a democratic right, actual decision-making remains concentrated within entrenched political elites. Drawing on theoretical models of participatory democracy, the study highlights the tension between autonomous and responsive legal frameworks, illustrating how formal structures provide opportunities for consultation while simultaneously constraining genuine influence. Case studies at both national and local levels demonstrate that participation is often reduced to ritualized forms of consultation, functioning more as a legitimizing device than as a vehicle for democratic accountability. Barriers, including restrictive legal provisions, elite dominance, bureaucratic hurdles, and weak institutional enforcement, further undermine meaningful inclusion. The analysis also explores the role of technology and online petitions as emerging avenues for participation, comparing Indonesian practices with experiences in the United Kingdom and Germany. While digital platforms offer potential for broader civic engagement, they are hindered by the digital divide and limited institutional responsiveness. The paper concludes that public participation in Indonesia is best understood as a political instrument shaped by power relations rather than a purely legal mechanism. Sustainable reforms require strengthening institutional accountability, enhancing technological accessibility, and addressing structural inequalities. By situating Indonesian practices within the global debates on participatory governance, the study underscores that the politics of participation extends beyond procedural inclusion to the contested terrain of legitimacy, authority, and power reproduction.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Proceeding APHTNHAN are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
This license allows others to:
-
Share. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
-
Adapt. remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
-
NonCommercial. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
ShareAlike. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
More details about this license are available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Authors retain the copyright of their work and grant Proceeding APHTNHAN the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
